Accommodation of females in soft vest and plate female body armor clothing systems presents a unique set of design problems. Incorporating females into male-based systems may impose disproportionate protective and functional sacrifices on females.
Concerns for Female Body armor clothing
Body armor clothing issued by the U.S. Military doesn't fit female soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. "It can actually be painful because of the way the plates are shaped." Demand better equipment for our brave service women. Throughout history, military gear has been made with the male physique in mind. But for women in today's combat or close-to-combat jobs, that can mean body armor clothing that fits so poorly it's tough to fire a weapon, combat uniforms with knee pads that hit around mid-shin and flight suits that make it nearly impossible to urinate while in a plane.
Female troops are about 20 percent more likely than their male counterparts to report musculoskeletal disorders, and poorly fitting body armor clothing could be a factor. For female aviators, dehydration can be a hazard if they opt not to drink water before flights, and those who wait too long to use the bathroom can experience urinary problems.
Solution for Female Body armor clothing Concern
The Army is studying unisex armor plate designs, while the Air Force is investigating female-specific geometries. Teams from both services are using male and female torso curves from 3-D surface scans for front/back and side plate shape concepts.
Originally introduced with Interceptor body armor clothing, the current front/back ballistic plate shape known as the enhanced small arms protective insert or ESAPI, was designed for male Soldiers. Those designs have been maintained during the evolution of body armor clothing and the deployment of the improved outer tactical vest.
If this issue is a problem to soft body armor clothing, how much more in the hard body armor clothing level like when there is a need to wear ceramic Body Armor For Sale?
No comments:
Post a Comment